BLOG POSTS
Categories
Archives
IFR #3
http://youtu.be/Z9NHpO_c7Sk
We have included 2 examples from our files to give you an idea of 1) a foreclosure from 2009 we were able to prevent and 1) that took place before it found its way to our office. The personal information is being protected for the privacy of our clients but we hope it will give you an idea on what you can look for in reviewing your situation.
These documents like many had a large number of details that didn’t look quite right. Originally we noticed the Notice of Default – which is the document that begins the foreclosure process – was filed prior to a change in servicing and assignment of the deed of trust. This means that the person who filed for the foreclosure is no longer servicing or owner of the mortgage account which is a requirement for foreclosure;
Next we have a certification stating that the lender is in possession of the original assignment of the Deed of Trust. At the time this document was “Notarized” the notary seal was expired by more than a year And in what appears to be an attempt to correct the problem someone changed the date on the state issued notary seal;
Looking at the copy of the Assignment provided with the flawed Certification we see someone stamped their name and title and signed and dated the document. Crossing out the stamp title AVP which typically would mean assistant Vice President and replacing it with the stamped title of Assistant Secretary.
Response to Las Vegas Business Press Article: “Mortgage ads misconstrued, lawyers say”.
It’s Creditworthy Not Credit Score…
Although Haines and Krieger are more comfortable in front of the camera than they were in their 2009 advertisements, conveying more advanced financial concepts sufficiently for potential clients to perform the services themselves may require something more.
I am less interested in these 2 points than I am in fundamental inconsistencies. To indicate a mortgage default does: “About a 100-point drop in the credit score as a result of the first missed house payment, and another approximately 100 points off when the second mortgage payment is missed”:
1. Represents scoring model practices that, at best, are no longer accurate in general practice. Not since the 1980’s and early 90’s, when the predominant credit score available was the FICO credit score, was this more likely to be accurate. The FICO score was designed to predict credit default. In the 1990’s and up to the present day major banks have published that they
It would be better to direct consumers to perceive value in “Creditworthiness” which is a financially responsible goal instead of a “Good Credit Score”:
2. You can spend a great deal of time, money, and effort achieving a “Good Credit Score” while not being viewed as Creditworthy.
Credit Evaluations are composed of these algorithms And “Automatic Pass” and “Automatic Fail” criteria. This means a person can have a credit score that is good enough to be issued credit but have a characteristic such as $250,000 in negative equity on their home that is an “Automatic Fail” for the credit application. So, a person who has successfully and responsibly managed 5-20 credit accounts over the last 5-20 years and has made their payments on time can very easily have a 750-850 credit score. But if any of these same people purchased or refinanced a home in Nevada 2005-2009 (or Miami, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Detroit…) they likely have a sizable amount of negative equity in their home which typically results in an “Automatic Fail”. If personal financial progress is desired these consumers should ask “How can I become more creditworthy?” Rather than “How do I improve my credit score?”
Avoiding irresponsibility may begin with not selling (or giving away) information that is marketable but not based in current financial fundamentals. For reasons why Consumer Credit Counseling Agencies may make fundamental errors that benefit big banks: http://youtu.be/yTA4JOBMC54
For more on Credit Scores and Credit Evaluations: http://youtu.be/4IG5ATEKgM8